- Most film and TV companies set up to fund a single production do not qualify for SEIS or EIS under HMRC’s risk to capital rules.
- Companies focused on long term growth, infrastructure, IP or scalable services may still be eligible, subject to HMRC discretion.
- Positioning, structure and advance assurance are critical to maximising approval chances for SEIS and EIS in the film and TV sector.
Can film and TV companies claim SEIS and EIS? In most cases, companies raising money to fund a single production no longer qualify. HMRC’s risk to capital condition makes it difficult for project based film and television businesses to access these schemes. However, some film and TV companies with genuine long term growth plans can still qualify, subject to HMRC discretion.
If you are considering raising investment, the safest first step is applying for SEIS and EIS advance assurance. This confirms eligibility before you approach investors and avoids costly delays later.
Why SEIS and EIS are challenging for film and TV companies
SEIS and EIS are intended for high growth trading companies, not low risk or asset backed investments. HMRC tightened the rules in 2018 to prevent relief being used where investor capital is largely protected.
Film and TV businesses often raise funding around individual productions. Income may be partially secured through presales, distribution agreements or completion bonds. From HMRC’s perspective, this reduces downside risk and conflicts with the purpose of the schemes.
Understanding the risk to capital condition for SEIS & EIS for film & TV companies
What HMRC is testing for
The risk to capital condition focuses on whether investors are genuinely exposed to loss while the company pursues long term growth. HMRC expects to see uncertainty, ambition and a real possibility that capital could be lost if the business fails.
HMRC explains how this test works in the Venture Capital Schemes Manual, which includes an example of a film company failing to meet the condition.
Why film projects often fail the test
A single production rarely demonstrates long term development. Once filming and distribution conclude, many companies have no ongoing trade, team or infrastructure. Even where multiple productions are planned, a project by project model can still fail to show the sustained growth HMRC requires.
Film and TV structures that are commonly rejected
HMRC scrutiny across the sector is consistent. The following structures are most often challenged:
Structure | Why HMRC has concerns |
Single film SPVs | No ongoing trade beyond one production |
Project based production companies | Limited evidence of scalable growth |
Presale heavy funding models | Reduced investor risk |
Combined use of creative tax reliefs | Lower perceived downside risk |
Many of these issues are also highlighted in SEIS and EIS common pitfalls seen during advance assurance reviews.
When film and TV companies may still qualify
Building a business rather than funding a project
SEIS and EIS may still be available where investment is used to build a standalone business that can grow independently of any single production. HMRC is far more receptive to companies that can continue trading even if a project underperforms.
This includes production companies developing original IP with long term exploitation plans, or businesses investing in permanent staff, infrastructure and brand development.
Service and technology led models
Studios offering repeatable services such as VFX, post production, animation or virtual production are often better positioned. Technology driven businesses building platforms or backend tools used across multiple productions may also qualify.
Understanding the difference between SEIS and EIS helps determine which route is realistic based on company age, funding size and risk profile.
What HMRC focuses on in advance assurance
Growth narrative and use of funds
Advance assurance is where most film and TV applications succeed or fail. HMRC closely examines how the business is framed and how investment will be used.
Applications are stronger when funds are allocated to permanent teams, product development, technology or IP creation. Emphasising guaranteed revenues or predictable outcomes usually weakens eligibility.
Evidence and compliance alignment
HMRC expects a coherent business plan, credible forecasts and consistency with the eligibility rules set out in its official SEIS and EIS guidance. Weak documentation is a common reason for rejection.
Practical steps to improve eligibility
Separating individual productions from the core trading company, focusing on long term capability building and avoiding language that suggests capital protection can materially improve outcomes.
For early stage businesses, guidance on using SEIS to raise investment can help shape structure before problems arise.
How Sleek helps film and TV companies with SEIS and EIS
SEIS and EIS applications in the film and TV sector face higher scrutiny than most. Structure, language and evidence must align precisely with HMRC expectations.
Sleek supports founders by assessing eligibility, shaping the growth narrative and managing advance assurance submissions end to end. This reduces uncertainty for investors and avoids costly delays or rejections later.
Fill in the contact form and we will get back to you soonest.
Disclaimer: The preceding information is not legal advice. This content is aimed to provide general guidance. For more formal or legal advice, contact Sleek directly.
FAQs on film and TV companies claiming SEIS and EIS
Can a film production company claim SEIS or EIS?
Usually not if the investment is funding a single production. Companies focused on long term growth may still qualify, subject to HMRC discretion.
Are film SPVs eligible for SEIS or EIS?
No. Special purpose vehicles created solely to fund individual films almost always fail the growth requirement.
Does producing multiple films improve eligibility?
Not on its own. A project by project model can still fail if there is no scalable business underpinning it.
Can studios or service providers qualify?
Yes, in some cases. Repeatable services and technology led businesses are more likely to meet HMRC’s criteria.
Do presales affect eligibility?
Yes. Presales can reduce perceived investor risk, which may undermine the risk to capital test.
Is advance assurance necessary?
It is not mandatory, but it is strongly recommended. It gives investors confidence and reduces the risk of relief being denied later.
Should film and TV companies seek specialist advice?
Yes. Given the complexity and scrutiny in this sector, specialist SEIS and EIS support significantly improves the likelihood of approval.
450,000
businesses worldwide.
from 4,100+ reviews.
satisfaction rate from
16,000 surveyed clients.
